[Development] [QLockFile] Whether it is reasonable to use 0644 permission ?

Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenhagen at qt.io
Wed Jul 27 11:40:18 CEST 2016

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:01:20AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016 09:49:14 PDT Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > Why just do not use 0666 permissions for this?
> We should use 0666 and let the umask determine which bits to exclude.
how exactly is this response supposed to be helpful in any way?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:41:34AM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> FWIW this is slightly related to https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53570
it's probably the correct solution *if* qlockfile can be actually used
for this purpose at all without causing other problems.

More information about the Development mailing list