[Development] [QLockFile] Whether it is reasonable to use 0644 permission ?

Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenhagen at qt.io
Wed Jul 27 11:40:18 CEST 2016


On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:01:20AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 27 de julho de 2016 09:49:14 PDT Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > Why just do not use 0666 permissions for this?
> 
> We should use 0666 and let the umask determine which bits to exclude.
> 
how exactly is this response supposed to be helpful in any way?

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:41:34AM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> FWIW this is slightly related to https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-53570
> 
it's probably the correct solution *if* qlockfile can be actually used
for this purpose at all without causing other problems.



More information about the Development mailing list