[Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on CentOS 6.7 x86_64 with g++

Helio Chissini de Castro helio at kde.org
Fri Mar 4 10:02:47 CET 2016


Hello again

The packages built on copr repository IS 5.6.0rc and is the reference that
we use to upstream in Fedora when reach final.

This is the proper repository:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kdesig/Qt5/

This is the repository to add on Yum
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kdesig/Qt5/repo/epel-6/heliocastro-Qt5-epel-6.repo

This are the effective packages:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kdesig/Qt5/packages/

[]'s Helio

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Heikkinen Jani <
jani.heikkinen at theqtcompany.com> wrote:

> >>Workaround: do not use the convenience qt-everywhere-* tarball. Build
> each
> >>module independently.
> >>
> >>Ossi: have there been changes to rpath or rpath-link handling recently?
> We
> >>need to bring it back.
>
> There is some fixes for src packages coming in after RC, see
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/150517/
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/150232/
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/151015/
>
> (+ c++98 related ones in https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/151328/ )
>
> Those all are now in qt5.git but we don't have re-created src packages for
> testing yet :(
>
> Br,
> Jani
>
>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Development [mailto:development-
> >>bounces+jani.heikkinen=theqtcompany.com at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of
> >>Thiago Macieira
> >>Sent: 4. maaliskuuta 2016 9:28
> >>To: development at qt-project.org
> >>Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on CentOS 6.7 x86_64
> with
> >>g++
> >>
> >>On sexta-feira, 4 de março de 2016 07:07:00 PST Walter Stefan wrote:
> >>> I have done a clean build.
> >>>
> >>> Where can we address this issue?
> >>
> >>I've managed to reproduce this issue now. It only happens with the old
> bfd
> >>linker (ld.bfd). Gold appears unaffected.
> >>
> >>Workaround: do not use the convenience qt-everywhere-* tarball. Build
> each
> >>module independently.
> >>
> >>Ossi: have there been changes to rpath or rpath-link handling recently?
> We
> >>need to bring it back.
> >>
> >>The command-line for linking the example was:
> >>
> >>g++ -Wl,-O1 -fuse-ld=bfd -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,-z,origin
> -Wl,-rpath,\
> >>$ORIGIN/../../../lib -o annotatedurl .obj/main.o .obj/mainwindow.o .obj/
> >>annotatedurl.o .obj/moc_mainwindow.o .obj/moc_annotatedurl.o -L/tmp/qt-
> >>build/
> >>qtbase/lib -lQt5Widgets.t -lQt5Gui.t -L/tmp/qt-build/qtconnectivity/lib -
> >>lQt5Nfc.t -lQt5Core.t -lGL -lpthread
> >>
> >>Every Qt module path in an -L option needs to be repeated with
> -Wl,-rpath-
> >>link,
> >>
> >>--
> >>Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> >>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Development mailing list
> >>Development at qt-project.org
> >>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20160304/39093b5c/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list