[Development] QCS2016 Session Notes - QUIPs for Qt
lars.knoll at qt.io
Tue Sep 20 19:53:36 CEST 2016
My thinking. I’m fine to have initial discussions on the mailing list, but agreeing on and nailing down details will be a lot easier to do on codereview.
On 20/09/16 19:04, "Development on behalf of Filippo Cucchetto" <development-bounces+lars.knoll=qt.io at qt-project.org on behalf of filippocucchetto at gmail.com> wrote:
Shouldn't be better to just announce a proposal on the mailing list
and then shift the discussion and feedbacks
on the codereview?
2016-09-20 18:46 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
> On terça-feira, 20 de setembro de 2016 08:54:05 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
>> And it formalizes the way we can discuss and comment on things, as QUIPs
>> would be reviewed in codereview, then approved there. I believe it’ll lead
>> to a better workflow and better decision making in the project than
>> discussions on the mailing list that often end somewhat inconclusive.
> Discussions on content still happen on the mailing list for maximum
> reachability. The discussion on codereview is just the editorial workflow.
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
More information about the Development