[Development] QCS2016 Session Notes - QUIPs for Qt

[Lars Knoll]

My thinking. I’m fine to have initial discussions on the mailing list, but agreeing on and nailing down details will be a lot easier to do on codereview.

Lars

On 20/09/16 19:04, "Development on behalf of Filippo Cucchetto" <development-bounces+lars.knoll=qt.io at qt-project.org on behalf of filippocucchetto at gmail.com> wrote:

    Really?
    Shouldn't be better to just announce a proposal on the mailing list
    and then shift the discussion and feedbacks
    on the codereview?
    
    2016-09-20 18:46 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:
    > On terça-feira, 20 de setembro de 2016 08:54:05 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
    >> And it formalizes the way we can discuss and comment on things, as QUIPs
    >> would be reviewed in codereview, then approved there. I believe it’ll lead
    >> to a better workflow and better decision making in the project than
    >> discussions on the mailing list that often end somewhat inconclusive.
    >
    > Discussions on content still happen on the mailing list for maximum
    > reachability. The discussion on codereview is just the editorial workflow.
    >
    > --
    > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
    >   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Development mailing list
    > Development at qt-project.org
    > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
    
    
    
    -- 
    Filippo Cucchetto
    _______________________________________________
    Development mailing list
    Development at qt-project.org
    http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development