[Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

Phil Bouchard philippeb8 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 21 18:16:31 CEST 2017


Cristian Adam <cristian.adam at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Phil Bouchard <philippeb8 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard <philippeb8 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ ->
>>>> WebAssembly) is a good plan.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> What does this have to do with Qt?
>>> 
>> 
>> For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript engine
>> entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ -> WebAssembly
>> sequence.
>> 
>> For the QML / Javascript dual then it could be replaced by with the QML /
>> BB++ dual and, which harness the power of C++14 and Root.Ptr and we can
>> just let the compiler do the hard work.
>> 
> 
> Does this mean that you can turn QML to C++ code and compile just C++ code?
> If so, wouldn't this render Qt Quick Compiler
> <http://doc.qt.io/QtQuickCompiler/> obsolete?

Yes basically on one hand but you will benefit from getting the garbage
collector away on the other hand.




More information about the Development mailing list