[Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS
Vlad Stelmahovsky
vladstelmahovsky at gmail.com
Sat Jul 22 11:52:09 CEST 2017
Phil,
Can you please explain benefits of having C++ -> WebAssembly ?
thanks
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Phil Bouchard <philippeb8 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard <philippeb8 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ ->
>>> WebAssembly) is a good plan.
>>>
>>
>> What does this have to do with Qt?
>>
>
> For a web engine I don't think it's possible to swap the Javascript engine
> entirely but it is possible to introduce the BB++ -> C++ -> WebAssembly
> sequence.
>
> For the QML / Javascript dual then it could be replaced by with the QML /
> BB++ dual and, which harness the power of C++14 and Root.Ptr and we can
> just let the compiler do the hard work.
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
--
Best regards,
Vlad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20170722/ecb2c9de/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list