[Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

Sylvain Pointeau sylvain.pointeau at gmail.com
Sun Jul 30 20:04:30 CEST 2017


I would suggest you to make your language feature complete before making
any benchmark.
For your information, lambda and variable capture cannot be discussed, it
is absolutely needed.

in my opinion, you totally under estimate the design of a language, please
read on Stroustrup / c++ etc.

as a first language design attempt, I would personnaly implement an
existing language that would fit the purpose. (kotlin, pascal?, etc)
as a scripting language, it will be very hard to propose anything else than
javascript, you can try of course but without a backing company, there is
very little chance to succeed.

Best regards,
Sylvain

Le dim. 30 juil. 2017 à 19:23, Phil Bouchard <philippeb8 at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> On 07/21/2017 12:22 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am now using C++14 standards, the error reporting is all compile-time
> > now and I get a test that is 3.5 faster than Node.JS! You can see it by
> > yourselves here:
> > https://github.com/philippeb8/root_ptr/tree/bb++/bbpp2cpp
>
> I just tried it on Windows 8.1 and the standard deviation is even
> greater: 4.2x faster on Windows when it is 3.5x faster on Linux (2.40
> GHz). This must be because Visual C++ generates slightly better code
> than G++.
>
> I'll generate documentation for your convenience soon.
>
>
> -Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20170730/884fa4da/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list