philwave at gmail.com
Sat Mar 18 18:42:31 CET 2017
André Pönitz <apoenitz at t-online.de> wrote:
> Qt was prioritizing application developer convenience over raw performance,
> making it easier for an application developers to create something working
> in reasonable time. That included features like consistency in the API
> and naming in general that made it possible to transfer knowledge of one
> part of the API to another. This also included recommendations for "one
> size fits all" usage patterns including default choices for containers.
Why are you speaking "in the past"?...
Is there a consensus that raw performance should now prime over developer
More information about the Development