[Development] QtCS 2017 QtCore sessions
Philippe
philwave at gmail.com
Wed Nov 1 13:30:12 CET 2017
And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?
Something sure, a Qt6 feature such as std::pmr::memory_resource (cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3dz-AKOVL8) would be more than welcome for Qt containers and strings.
Philippe
On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:23:04 +0300
???? ?????????? <abbapoh at gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for digging the thread, but how is
> * use qssize_t
> and
> ** Wrapping std::{unordered_}map may be acceptable
> combines?
>
> std::*map uses size_t in it's API (size, max_size, count, reserve, begin(size_type), end(size_type))
>
>
> And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20171101/bbd86cfb/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list