[Development] QtCS 2017 QtCore sessions

Philippe philwave at gmail.com
Wed Nov 1 13:30:12 CET 2017


And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?

Something sure, a Qt6 feature such as std::pmr::memory_resource (cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3dz-AKOVL8) would be more than welcome for Qt containers and strings.

Philippe

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:23:04 +0300
???? ?????????? <abbapoh at gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry for digging the thread, but how is 
> *  use qssize_t
> and 
> ** Wrapping std::{unordered_}map may be acceptable
>  combines?
> 
> std::*map uses size_t in it's API (size, max_size, count, reserve, begin(size_type), end(size_type))
> 
> 
> And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20171101/bbd86cfb/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list