[Development] QtCS 2017 QtCore sessions

[Konstantin Tokarev]

01.11.2017, 15:30, "Philippe" <philwave at gmail.com>:
> And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?
>
> Something sure, a Qt6 feature such as std::pmr::memory_resource (cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3dz-AKOVL8) would be more than welcome for Qt containers and strings.

Using virtual functions for allocation/deallocation doesn't seem like a bright idea

>
> Philippe
>
> On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:23:04 +0300
> ???? ?????????? <abbapoh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for digging the thread, but how is
>> *  use qssize_t
>> and
>> ** Wrapping std::{unordered_}map may be acceptable
>>  combines?
>> std::*map uses size_t in it's API (size, max_size, count, reserve, begin(size_type), end(size_type))
>>
>> And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?
>
> ,
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development


-- 
Regards,
Konstantin