[Development] Future of QBS

BogDan Vatra bogdan at kdab.com
Mon Oct 16 08:31:18 CEST 2017

On luni, 16 octombrie 2017 17:38:53 EEST Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 16 October 2017 at 15:42, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
> > Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> >> I would resume this post as "I love CMake, CMake is the only way.
> >> You're all wrong."
> >> This post doesn't explain anything, doesn't gives any analysis, no
> >> comparison, no argument whatsoever, nothing.
> > 
> > It makes one important point (and elaborates it to great lengths):
> > developer familiarity. Even if QBS were actually a lot better than CMake
> > (something I am also very sceptical about), it would still be universally
> > hated simply because it is not what developers (and distribution
> > packagers!) know.
> Universally, really? In your world maybe, not in mine.
> Anyway, I think the discussion is turning sterile, at least for me.
> You are free to make your own choice, and so am I.
> In case my wording sounded harsh, I would like to let you know that I
> am genuinely happy for you to be in charge of CMake support, I mean
> it.

"Kevin Kofler" != "Kevin Funk" ...

Whatever you're smoking, I want some too ;-) !


More information about the Development mailing list