[Development] Orphan modules

[Chris Adams]

Hi Eddy,

I'm willing to be listed as the maintainer of QtFeedback for now.  If
it ever gets more development attention and released as a supported
module then someone with more time to give should probably take over,
but until then I'm more than happy to review any changes people might
contribute for that module.

Cheers,
Chris.


On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Edward Welbourne
<edward.welbourne at qt.io> wrote:
> I notice, as part of seeking folk to look at API reviews, that we have
> several modules with no Maintainer: qtandroidextras, qtgraphicaleffects,
> qtmacextras, qtquick1, qtquickcontrols, qtsvg, qtwinextras and (the one
> that brought this to my attention) qtxmlpatterns, according to [0].
>
> * [0] https://wiki.qt.io/Maintainers
>
> (There's also qtdoc, with no person as maintainer, but with "Norway" in
> the Country column, which I interpret as the doc-team here in Oslo; and
> there's qtfeedback, which is unsupported; two other unsupported modules
> do in fact have Maintainers.)
>
> If anyone out there feels an urge to volunteer to adopt one of these
> orphans, it'd be worth speaking up,
>
>         Eddy.
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development