[Development] Deprecation of Qt Quick Controls 1

NIkolai Marchenko enmarantispam at gmail.com
Wed Feb 7 16:02:18 CET 2018


I really don't want to go there for a project I am not paid to develop :)

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>
wrote:

>
>
> 07.02.2018, 17:42, "NIkolai Marchenko" <enmarantispam at gmail.com>:
> > even stuff like that?
> > https://imgur.com/a/tTFeO
> > I doubt it. I really don't want to delve into manual painter usage and
> styleoptions when I can just quickly make such stuff with qml listview.
>
> FWIW, in company where I work we routinely did such UIs for embedded
> systems with Qt 4 and widgets. However, it required quite a bit of work to
> implement basic ListView with pluggable renderers. However, we didn't use
> QStyle and style options, and had no tough controls like combo box there.
>
> > And basically the only thing that really hurts me with controls 2 is
> that combobox becomes quite horrible
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>
> wrote:
> >
> >> 07.02.2018, 16:13, "NIkolai Marchenko" <enmarantispam at gmail.com>:
> >>> And no, widgets is not an alterlative to proper qml controls on
> desktop when you want custom interface.
> >>> I have an app that uses qml to draw a custom listview for users, it
> would be extremely hard to replicate it with widgets and why should I do
> that when I have qml?
> >>
> >> FWIW, it's not really hard to implement your own ItemView widgets.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Konstantin
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Konstantin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20180207/b5ed1d5a/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list