[Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models

[Lars Knoll]

I'd say we add one line for qtbase/Qt Core/Item models in the maintainer wiki. 'Item models' would probably also be the best name for Jira.

Cheers,
Lars

> On 2 May 2018, at 08:34, Alex Blasche <alexander.blasche at qt.io> wrote:
> 
> It was pointed out to me that this vote has come due. The usual response is to update Jira components and the maintainer wiki. Neither of these have a category for this. What is the conclusion here? Do we need a new entry in the wiki and Jira? If so what would be the name for it.
> 
> --
> Alex
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Development <development-bounces+alexander.blasche=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, 1 April 2018 8:18:24 PM
> To: development at qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing David Faure as maintainer of Qt Models
> 
> Sérgio Martins wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 
>> Although the wiki says Qt Models don't have a maintainer I'd say David
>> Faure has been an unofficial maintainer.
>> David is one of the top contributors to model related code and is
>> someone you'll always want to add as reviewer.
>> 
>> He's well known in the community and already maintains QtXmlPatterns, Qt
>> mimetypes and Qt3Support.
>> 
>> Disclaimer: David works with me at KDAB.
>> (And if you're wondering if KDAB has any plans for this module, the
>> answer is no. In fact I hope it remains low change volume).
>> 
>> 
>> Finally, a big thanks to the previous maintainer, Stephen Kelly, who did
>> a great job, both on Qt and KDE models!
> 
> +1 for David from me too!
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Steve.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development