[Development] Who is in charge of qt-project.org?

[NIkolai Marchenko]

TQtC has essentially alienated the very people they want to have on their
side for new stuff: early adopters.
People willing to try and help develop stuff for them. I will not feel
inclined to try anything new you guys showcase in teh future.
Have fun devoping technologies without testers.

On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 3:15 PM Martin Smith <Martin.Smith at qt.io> wrote:

> >You've just dropped Qbs, what's next?
> >I don't trust you anymore, nor the company-ies you represent - Nothing
> personal.
> >I think that it is time for the qt-project.org domain to be handed
> >back to the Qt Project community.
>
> But "dropped Qbs" means The Qt Company won't be developing Qbs anymore,
> which means, effectively, Qbs is being handed to the Qt Project community.
>
> martin
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Development <development-bounces+martin.smith=qt.io at qt-project.org>
> on behalf of Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 1:08:34 PM
> To: Lars Knoll
> Cc: development at qt-project.org; v.ronin at yahoo.it
> Subject: Re: [Development] Who is in charge of qt-project.org?
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 23:55, Lars Knoll <lars.knoll at qt.io> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2 Nov 2018, at 11:45, Christian Gagneraud <chgans at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 22:25, Kain Vampire via Development
> > <development at qt-project.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > I have to apologise for my behaviour. While I still think Christian
> Gagneraud's attack on the Qt company abilities was unfair and uncalled for,
> it's not a justification for my actions.
> > Creating an hostile environment is bad for the community and I should
> not have done it.
> > It won't happen again,
> > Regards,
> > Luca
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I would  like to apologise as well, my sarcasm and my provocation went
> > uncontrolled.
> > My fault, this was definitely not the most clever way to get things
> sorted.
> > I'm looking forward HTTPS://lists.qt-project.org to be back online and
> > would like to thanks everyone working on the matter.
> >
> >
> > Thanks Chris and Luca.
> >
> > Getting lists.qt-project.org fixed is being worked on. I hope it’s
> won’t be too long.
> >
> > But there’s something to take away for TQtC as the party taking care of
> the infrastructure here. TQtC needs to establish some more pro-active
> monitoring of the infrastructure so that these things will get ideally get
> fixed before they become a problem next time. I’ll see what I can do to
> help getting that in place.
>
> <big-warning message="not cool at all" apologies="you have been
> warned, do not keep reading if you do not fell comfortable">
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> You've just dropped Qbs, what's next?
> I don't trust you anymore, nor the company-ies you represent - Nothing
> personal.
> I think that it is time for the qt-project.org domain to be handed
> back to the Qt Project community.
> I was reading a french article this morning
> (https://linuxfr.org/news/fedora-29), i give you an inaccurate, but
> syntactic and compact translation of the article introduction:
>
> Fedora is a GNU/Linux distribution developed by the Fedora Project and
> sponsored by Red Hat that provide them with developers, finance and
> logistics.
> Fedora can be seen as an open source technological show case of Red
> Hat proprietary technology. (NDLR: Free and inaccurate translation, i
> mean it)
> => sold for 34 billions dollars
>
> How do you fell about that? Do you see similarities?
>
> Is the triple-licensed Qt stack an open source technological show case
> of what the Qt Company has to offer?
> </big-warning>
>
> More seriously, yes, Fedora/RedHat  and
> Qt/Project/Company/Digia/Nokia/Microsoft/TrollTech are different beast
> (apple and oranges, yadi, yada, ...).
> But I see similarities. (and i do not care about the 34 billions)
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20181102/8b1a5c5a/attachment.html>