[Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

[Laszlo Agocs]

Fully agree. Is it really necessary to dedicate ca. half of the proposed document to sections full of "enforcement", "ban", "violation", "danger", etc., which in the end leads to creating an overly dark and bureaucratic vibe?

Laszlo

________________________________
From: Development <development-bounces+laszlo.agocs=qt.io at qt-project.org> on behalf of André Pönitz <apoenitz at t-online.de>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 7:39 PM
To: Volker Krause
Cc: development at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Volker Krause via Development wrote:
> We do have a Code of Conduct at KDE for about 10 years now, and this hasn't
> led to abuse of power, suppression of free speech, racism against white people
> or whatever other nonsense people seem to attribute to CoCs nowadays.

The KDE CoC is *friendly*. It contains words like "considerate", "pragmatic",
"support". It doesn't push someone's personal political agenda.  This is a
completely different beast than the Contributor Covenant that's about
"enforcing", "reporting", "banning".

I think we'd see much less heat in the discussion if the proposed Qt CoC had
been based on the KDE CoC.

Andre'
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20181025/da8db344/attachment.html>