[Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

[Tomasz Siekierda]

> The controversial discrimination protection sentences at least should be carefully discussed. It's not some thing that we could accept as easy as rewrite.

Hi Alexey, I've just read the QUIP proposal and couldn't find any
controversial sentences. Could you elaborate? Which points shall be
discussed?
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 22:41, Konstantin Shegunov <kshegunov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 11:20 PM Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> The answer to all of those questions needs to be "yes". Anything short of that
>> means the CoC is powerless and just for show.
>
>
> Which was my point exactly.
>
>>
>> Whether there's a termination of employment or not is out of scope, since the
>> CoC does not rule TQtC employment and what other work there is inside that
>> company.
>>
>>
>> Note also it applies to any company. If you're not welcome anymore in the
>> community where your employer is asking you to do work, that is going to
>> affect your employment.
>
>
> I agree. However my argument was that the QtC being a major contributor to the codebase is going to have to abide by the ruling of the proposed committee, which is a significant commitment (and a major nitpick I admit).
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development