[Development] QUIP 12: Code of Conduct

[Alexey Andreyev]

Hello, Tomasz! :)
Thank you for the question!

Current draft based on CoC:

> Our Pledge
> ==========
> In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment, we
> as contributors to and maintainers of the Qt Project pledge to make
> participation in our project and our community a harassment-free
> experience for everyone, regardless of age, body size, disability,
> ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, level
> of experience, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal
> appearance, race, religion, or sexual identity and orientation,
> or any other characteristics that are not relevant to a person's
> ability to contribute to the Qt Project.

and KDE version:

> We do not tolerate personal attacks, racism, sexism or any other form of
discrimination.

Do we have any research about effects it leading?

How many discrimination suspicions do we have right now?

How could it be resolved successfully at digital community?

How many misuse examples do we have at open projects since accepting
similar rules?

How CoC board are going to protect community from discrimination and
harassment?

Are CoC committee ready for "affirmative action"?

I'm not against the rules as a concept, I agree we need it,
but I totally against perverted or undefined rules that could help to
destroy the community.

I could not accept argument like "let's accept just anything and see how it
goes and fix something later".
"Don't code today what you can't debug tomorrow" :)

I'm just saying we should think twice befoce accepting something.

P.S.: I'm ready to change my mind if I've made a mistake, feel free to
criticize, correct and ignore me :)

вс, 28 окт. 2018 г. в 10:47, Tomasz Siekierda <sierdzio at gmail.com>:

> > The controversial discrimination protection sentences at least should be
> carefully discussed. It's not some thing that we could accept as easy as
> rewrite.
>
> Hi Alexey, I've just read the QUIP proposal and couldn't find any
> controversial sentences. Could you elaborate? Which points shall be
> discussed?
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 at 22:41, Konstantin Shegunov <kshegunov at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 11:20 PM Thiago Macieira <
> thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The answer to all of those questions needs to be "yes". Anything short
> of that
> >> means the CoC is powerless and just for show.
> >
> >
> > Which was my point exactly.
> >
> >>
> >> Whether there's a termination of employment or not is out of scope,
> since the
> >> CoC does not rule TQtC employment and what other work there is inside
> that
> >> company.
> >>
> >>
> >> Note also it applies to any company. If you're not welcome anymore in
> the
> >> community where your employer is asking you to do work, that is going to
> >> affect your employment.
> >
> >
> > I agree. However my argument was that the QtC being a major contributor
> to the codebase is going to have to abide by the ruling of the proposed
> committee, which is a significant commitment (and a major nitpick I admit).
> > _______________________________________________
> > Development mailing list
> > Development at qt-project.org
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20181028/2d78bbb7/attachment.html>