[Development] QHash for Qt 6
Giuseppe D'Angelo
giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Fri Dec 20 15:10:09 CET 2019
Il 20/12/19 13:54, Vitaly Fanaskov ha scritto:
> This is not that easy to use std::* containers because at least the
> following issues have to be addressed:
>
> * Memory management
> * Binary compatibility
> * Implementation consistency
>
> You probably can provide, for example, some allocators, relax
> compatibility requirements and so on... The question only is whether
> this is worth doing or not.
I'm not totally sure I understand this point. What do you mean by
"memory management"? (Binary compatibility of stdlib is not an issue,
and implementation consistency for containers shouldn't really be either).
>
> Personally I tend thinking that this is better to maintain, extend and
> improve what we already have rather than address the issues listed
> above. Again, this is just a personal opinion.
>
It's just a problem of "who does the work", and we've got a terrible
track record at that. But I grant that implementing containers is fun,
and I'm not doing the work, so I shut up :)
Thanks,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20191220/16c75081/attachment.bin>
More information about the Development
mailing list