[Development] Qt 5 types under consideration for deprecation / removal in Qt 6
abbapoh at gmail.com
Sun Jun 9 00:30:23 CEST 2019
No, they should not.
C++ committee understands the problem of ugly iterators and it seems they have a solution - ranges.
Why do you want to use qSort instead of std::ranges::sort?
I don’t see any advantages of the qSort() here.
No more ugly begin/end pair. Problem solved. There’s no use-case for the qSort.
> 9 июня 2019 г., в 0:09, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> написал(а):
> QtAlgorithms should just be undeprecated. I don't care whether std::sort is
> faster. If the version of Qt I tested with was fast enough, then I'm
> perfectly fine with newer versions not being faster, no matter how fast some
> incompatible implementation elsewhere is (and I don't care whether it
> happens to ship with my compiler or not).
> Kevin Kofler
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
More information about the Development