[Development] Qt 5 types under consideration for deprecation / removal in Qt 6

André Pönitz apoenitz at t-online.de
Sun Jun 9 13:21:01 CEST 2019

On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 12:30:23AM +0200, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> No, they should not. 
> C++ committee understands the problem of ugly iterators and it seems they have a solution - ranges.
> Why do you want to use qSort instead of std::ranges::sort?

Because the compiler might not support it.

> QVector<int> v;
> qSort(v);
> std::ranges::sort(v);
> I don’t see any advantages of the qSort() here.
> No more ugly begin/end pair. Problem solved.
> There’s no use-case for the qSort.


More information about the Development mailing list