[Development] Qt 5 types under consideration for deprecation / removal in Qt 6

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Wed Jun 12 11:26:21 CEST 2019

On 11/06/2019 22:13, André Pönitz wrote:
> Can we at the very least agree that each party is allowed to use the
> same*pattern*  of reasoning in this discussion, no matter on how
> much merit we see in the individual argument?

I'd rather avoid using any logical fallacy when possible, instead of 
doubling down (... or actually decupling down).

My 2 c,
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190612/b48bd2a9/attachment.bin>

More information about the Development mailing list