[Development] Proposing CMake as build tool for Qt 6
Christian Gagneraud
chgans at gmail.com
Mon Jun 17 09:10:29 CEST 2019
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, 18:11 Jedrzej Nowacki, <Jedrzej.Nowacki at qt.io> wrote:
> On Saturday, June 15, 2019 6:37:24 PM CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Saturday, 15 June 2019 02:18:28 PDT Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote:
> > > You can download a CMake static binary (https://cmake.org/download/)
> that
> >
> > (...)
> >
> > I would prefer that our requirements be present in Linux distributions we
> > declare are supported build environments. If nothing else, our CI will
> > benefit from this.
>
> Let's not pull CI into it. It already
Wow! Let's not pull in the system which only goal is to validate the
"supported platforms" promise, is it what you mean?
If I need a special cmake to build Qt, then this should be shipped as part
of Qt itself, another third-party source tree.
And then it means that I will need to build qt's build system. In other
words, I'll have to bootstrap Qt build system.
I thought that it was a big no-no. The main argument to ditch qmake and
qbs...
Chris
covers installation of the cmake in
> order to test wip/cmake branch (
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt5.git/tree/coin/
> provisioning/common/linux/cmake_linux.sh?h=wip/cmake
> <https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qt5.git/tree/coin/provisioning/common/linux/cmake_linux.sh?h=wip/cmake>
> )
>
> Cheers,
> Jędrek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190617/9a6fdf14/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list