[Development] Assistant WebKit/WebEngine support

[Konstantin Tokarev]

24.06.2019, 12:23, "Eike Ziller" <eike.ziller at qt.io>:
>>  On 24. Jun 2019, at 08:20, Palaraja, Kavindra <KPalaraja at luxoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Andre,
>>
>>  I'm really curious -- why is it bad to make WebEngine mandatory for anything that passes as "Qt Creator's Help Integration”?
>
> - QtWebEngine is a big beast
> - and browsing help only needs a small subset of the actual features of QtWebEngine
> - we do not want the “connect to the internet” part in Qt Creator, since that has lots of implications (security, privacy), and a help viewer doesn’t need it either.
>
>>  I'm asking because, these days, many Software companies spend a lot of time, energy, and money in making their documentation look and feel good. This includes not just the large chunks of content that's published, but also the in-line text, UI strings, tooltips, etc. They believe that it adds to the developer experience.
>>
>>  The Qt Project has a unique opportunity here, in that we have our own IDE, which is a luxury. And there's also a way to use an existing module, WebEngine, to improve this look and feel (among other reasons). So why shouldn't we use it?
>>
>>  Have you seen Qt Creator's Help Integration recently?
>>  * It doesn't render 1:1 with the default style that is used on https://doc.qt.io
>
> Yes, the style has to be changed for QTextBrowser. Partly that is a limitation of QTextBrowser (like the issues below), partly offline documentation integrated into an application should look different than the online variant anyhow (like not having the Google search).
>
>>  * It can't display the borders for tables - so every single table looks weird as all borders are stripped out. Qt's documentation is full of tables.
>>  * It doesn't scale images accordingly, so you have manually guess what Creator can display and try really hard to shrink your diagrams without losing clarity
>>
>>  Is this really what we want to showcase to our customers?
>
> Well, what I’d really like would be a lightweight RichText / HTML+CSS viewer without all the baggage of a complete internet browser. QTextBrowser does too little, QtWebEngine much too much.

So, QtWebKit should be the right thing then?

>
> Br, Eike
>
>>  Kavindra.
>>
>>  On 23.06.19, 19:09, "Development on behalf of André Pönitz" <development-bounces at qt-project.org on behalf of apoenitz at t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>>     On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 01:05:32PM +0000, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>>>  Would we provide a menu in the start menu for "Qt documentation" that
>>>  would launch the web server and then the user preferred web browser with
>>>  that url? How is the server terminated?
>>>
>>>  Either way, this requires developing either a new frontend application
>>>  first or a back-end that can do the index searches, etc.
>>>
>>>  To me it seems easier to solve this first by making the Qt Assistant use
>>>  WebEngine and when we later have a better doc "frontend" (as web app)
>>>  switch to that and potentially an external browser.
>>
>>     As that this does not make WebEngine mandatory for anyhthing that passes
>>     as "Qt Creator's Help integration"...
>>
>>     Andre'
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Development mailing list
>>     Development at qt-project.org
>>     https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>>
>>  ________________________________
>>
>>  This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named above and others who have been specifically authorized to receive them. They may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read this email or its attachment(s). Furthermore, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any attachment(s) or copies thereof from your system. Thank you.
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Development mailing list
>>  Development at qt-project.org
>>  https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
>
> --
> Eike Ziller
> Principal Software Engineer
>
> The Qt Company GmbH
> Rudower Chaussee 13
> D-12489 Berlin
> eike.ziller at qt.io
> http://qt.io
> Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi,
> Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin