[Development] Qt 5 types under consideration for deprecation / removal in Qt 6

[Simon Hausmann]

Yes, verdigris is awesome. Olivier rocks:)

I’m uncertain that it will be proposed as replacement for Qt 6 though.

I think it makes total sense side by side to the moc, in any case.

Simon

On 30. May 2019, at 21:00, NIkolai Marchenko <enmarantispam at gmail.com<mailto:enmarantispam at gmail.com>> wrote:

> So far nobody has stepped up to attempt to replace the mo
https://github.com/woboq/verdigris   not quite true

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:59 PM Simon Hausmann <Simon.Hausmann at qt.io<mailto:Simon.Hausmann at qt.io>> wrote:
So far nobody has stepped up to attempt to replace the moc, so I doubt that it will be replaced in Qt 6.

Simon

> On 30. May 2019, at 20:46, Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru<mailto:annulen at yandex.ru>> wrote:
>
>
>
> 30.05.2019, 21:18, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>>:
>> On Wednesday, 29 May 2019 06:33:23 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
>> wrote:
>>> 2) should QRegExp stay in bootstrap? I have no idea of what's happening
>>> regarding to that in Qt 6.
>>
>> Bootstrap needs to go away in Qt 6.
>
> Does it mean that moc will be reimplemented to avoid using Qt classes?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Konstantin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development at qt-project.org<mailto:Development at qt-project.org>
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20190530/056c533f/attachment.html>