[Development] INTEGRITY

[Mutz, Marc]

Quoting https://www.ghs.com/products/compiler.html:

> C++11 and C++14 support
> 
> Green Hills Compilers support ISO/IEC 14882:2011 (C++11) and
> ISO/IEC 14882:2014 (C++14) which offers a number of new
> language features and standard libraries. These includes
> standardized threading support for mutexes, atomics,
> future/promise, and the use of the thread_local keyword.

So, is the CI just using a totally outdated toolchain?

Thanks,
Marc


On 2019-09-18 12:29, Mutz, Marc via Development wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can someone expand on the plan forward for the supported INTEGRITY 
> toolchains?
> 
> Lars is talking about using C++17 for Qt 6, yet the INTEGRITY version
> in the CI for Qt 5.14 doesn't even support C++_11_. It's a constant
> pain for anything constexpr-related, and now it turns out that while
> it happily compiles std::condition_variable, it fails with a linker
> error later. An error not detected in the CI until qt5 integration
> time.
> 
> Qt 5.14 is the eighth release of Qt to require C++11. How did we get
> into a situation where there's one platform that doesn't even support
> basic C++11? Why wasn't it dropped when MSVC 2013 was?
> 
> There's no maintainer listed for the platform in the Wiki (can we get
> that fixed, please?), yet Ville tells me this is a 'gold platform' for
> Qt releases.
> 
> Can someone, please, square me how how Qt 6 should be based on C++17
> if current INTEGRITY doesn't even support C++11?
> 
> And can we please have a Qtbase CI that _actually_ tests INTEGRITY?
> 
> Thanks,
> Marc
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development