[Development] Making Binary Incompatible Changes after Qt 6.0

Benjamin TERRIER b.terrier at gmail.com
Tue Dec 8 21:45:57 CET 2020


On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 17:44, Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer at qt.io>
wrote:

>
>
> > On 8 Dec 2020, at 16:28, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, 8 December 2020 01:55:12 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo via
> Development
> > wrote:
> >> Raising the bar: apart from some cases of API problems in 6.0, would it
> >> be feasible to do a BC break after every LTS? We might find more
> >> annoyances we want to fix.
> >
> > So long LTSs don't happen more often than every 4 years.
>
> Hm, every third release is an LTS: 5.9, 5.12, 5.15, perhaps 6.2.
>
> So, that’s every 1.5 years if we stick to the current release cadence.
>
> As a Qt developer I find this very tempting. But it also means that the
> whole world has to rebuild all the Qt things every 18 months, which is
> perhaps not great from an eco-system perspective.
>
>
>
>
Aren't LTS a commercial only thing now?
So doing a BC after an LTS isn't much different than doing it after any
other version for distro maintainers and the open source world in general.

Benjamin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20201208/85603bb9/attachment.html>


More information about the Development mailing list