[Development] The future of smart pointers in Qt API

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Sun Feb 2 22:13:13 CET 2020


On 02/02/2020 21:26, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>> This is a logical fallacy; "I don't need it, noone else does".
> Yes, but it's a logical fallacy you yourself made up

Excuse me?

> In my work experience, when I'm
> not allowed to use Qt and am restricted to the STL, all the times I had
> to use std::unique_ptr was to get the same behaviour as a QScopedPointer.


-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20200202/14814556/attachment.bin>


More information about the Development mailing list