[Development] QProperty and library coding guide

Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Tue Jul 21 22:48:42 CEST 2020

On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 22:12, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 21 July 2020 10:40:27 PDT Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> > A very significant goal of this exercise is achieving notational
> > convenience. Theoretical concerns about UB
> > in the presence of papers that apparently excise that UB shouldn't
> > stand in the way of that goal.
> Sorry, I don't agree. We can't use something that is unimplementable.

Oh, when did that change? Was qobject_cast changed not to be UB?

More information about the Development mailing list