[Development] Important recent changes in QList/QString/QByteArray

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Thu Sep 10 11:29:49 CEST 2020

Il 10/09/20 08:48, Andrei Golubev ha scritto:
>     That's the dilemma that Andrei was talking about. Either solution is
>     valid and
>     both have a way for you to tell QList to do what you want.
> Oh, but it's not a question of "if". It is already done in latest dev 
> this way, the shrinking erase, I mean (not sure who was an author of the 
> original change).

But reallocating on erase still falls under the problem that it 
invalidates everything, including the part before the erased range.

Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20200910/b783bf0d/attachment.bin>

More information about the Development mailing list