[Development] Qt 6.1 Feature Freeze is in effect now
edward.welbourne at qt.io
Fri Feb 5 11:56:37 CET 2021
On 2/4/21 12:20 PM, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>>> The 6.1 branch’s sha1 is whatever the sha1 in dev was when the
>>> branch was created. Things start to diverge from there, but at
>>> branching sha1, the new branch’s consistent set is whatever
>>> .qtmodules and dependencies.yaml states at that time. Does it matter
>>> whether .gitmodules points to the HEAD of that new branch? I suppose
>>> not, we are not releasing yet. If we release, we’d basically release
>>> dev’s last consistent set.
>>> Then we cherry-pick changes into the new branch, and do the usual
>>> submodule process for that new branch. Eventually, we will have a
>>> consistent set again for the branch.
>>> Some times, cherry-picks will break dependencies, and then we don’t
>>> have a consistent set. That’s the same situation, isn’t it?
Joerg Bornemann (perjantai 5. helmikuuta 2021 9.57) wrote
>> Right, I was missing that you want to do the submodule update rounds for
>> the 6.x branch instead of dev. I suppose that would work. To summarize, the
>> process would be:
>> - branch off 6.x in all repos from whatever is currently is dev
>> - do submodule update rounds for 6.x
>> - needed fixes for submodule updates go into 6.x with Pick-to: dev
>> I like the simplicity. No bot fiddling and no "imminent not-yet-created
>> branch" concept.
Jani Heikkinen (5 February 2021 10:49) replied
> Well, that might easy up things a bit. But I don't like the idea where
> we would do branching from a state where dependencies might be broken;
> this isn't just updating submodules in qt(5).git but also updating
> dependencies in modules as well. I think it is better to fix all
> issues at first in one branch and do the branching after that; that
> way we should be able to continue working normally immediately after
> branching in both branches instead of fixing 2 branches at same
The way we've been doing it, the new branch starts out in a coherent
state; however, within days it gets updates which require consistency
updates (inter-module dependency.yaml changes, qt5.git
synchorinisation). As I understand Volker's plan, it just starts out in
the state you'd get to after a few days, which shouldn't be a problem.
Am I missing something ?
More information about the Development