[Development] Changes to Freenode's IRC

[Tuukka Turunen]

Hi,

Before simply voting for new irc provider, I would still prefer to have the QtCS discussion on the topic.

We should also discuss and define what is the intention / intentions of the channels, because this can affect the choice.

If it is for contributors to discuss with each other and release team meetings it may be different than if intention is to discuss with Qt users. For the latter purposes we should have a bit wider discussion and also plan how to best link this to the needs of today. For the former we should also consider how to attract new contributors, not only think what works best for existing. That being important as well.

Another important thing to note is that everyone developing Qt is now pretty much focused in completing thing for Qt 6.2 FF. So now is not the best time to plan how to develop the communication channels.

Yours,

Tuukka

________________________________
Lähettäjä: Development <development-bounces at qt-project.org> käyttäjän Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development <development at qt-project.org> puolesta
Lähetetty: perjantaina, toukokuuta 21, 2021 7:07 ip.
Vastaanottaja: development at qt-project.org
Aihe: Re: [Development] Changes to Freenode's IRC

On 21/05/2021 14:40, Cristián Maureira-Fredes wrote:
> @Giuseppe regarding the consensus, should we do a thread for voting
> the movement to libera only? or you think we could agree differently
> of doing the move.

Yes, I'm afraid that I screwed this one up, apologies :(

I'll guess I'll start a new thread, *only* for voting.

Thank you,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20210521/887349be/attachment.html>