[Development] Implementing small SVG 1.1 features (as opposed to SVG Tiny 1.2)

[Christoph Feck]

On 10/13/21 11:58, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote:
> On 13/10/2021 11:43, Albert Astals Cid via Development wrote:
>> Should we allow some small features outside of the declared SVG Tiny 1.2
>> support?
>
> I'm not against in principle (liberal in what you accept, etc.etc.), but
> as you say, it's going to become a nightmare to document exactly what
> it's supported or not.

It is simplest to not document any extra features. A Tiny conformant
renderer is not supposed to render Full features wrong on purpose; if
it renders those correctly, so be it. If it doesn't, nobody is to blame.