[Development] 6.7 FF vs. C++20 comparisons

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Fri Dec 15 09:29:54 CET 2023


Il 13/12/23 18:36, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
> On Wednesday, 13 December 2023 08:46:57 -03 Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
>> The question I have, therefore, is the following: is converting more
>> classes to the new framework considered a feature as in "affected by FF"?
> I'd say simple changes should be fine. There should be no behaviour change at
> all, anywhere. If that turns out to be a large change, we may want to
> postpone; if it breaks something, then we've likely found a bug.

I'm also +1 on the same grounds. I'm very mildly concerned about "breaks 
something", not in the sense that a rewrite of the operators using the 
new facilities will not work, but that it might have semantic changes 
that will break BC (e.g. for inline code). It was quite hard to spot it 
on QModelIndex...

Thank you,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4244 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20231215/b157244f/attachment.bin>


More information about the Development mailing list