[Development] 6.7 FF vs. C++20 comparisons

Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Tue Dec 19 01:20:49 CET 2023


On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 13:22, apoenitz <apoenitz at t-online.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:40:28AM +0000, Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> > On 13.12.23 18:36, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > So, +1 for me on going ahead.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Is anyone else here for/against?
>
> To me this doesn't look like a new feature, so I don't see the feature freeze
> blocking this formally.

I don't see how it's not a new feature. "Convert more classes to opt
in to C++20 three-way comparison"
reads like a new feature to me for every word of it.

> Maybe I am just generally lacking a certain sense of urgency here to have
> this kind of changes, but I think it would be better to avoid the risk by
> simply not doing it.

I don't understand why it needs to be rushed into 6.7, instead of
doing it without such rush for 6.8.
Thus my take on this is -1.


More information about the Development mailing list