[Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

[Thiago Macieira]

On Monday, 13 November 2023 01:34:08 PST Ivan Solovev via Development wrote:
> Thiago wrote:
> > The problem is that QPartialOrdering::Unordered has been in our ABI since
> > 6.1 and we can't change that any more.
> 
> Well, Marc already suggested a solution for this problem.
> Let's just introduce Qt::{strong,weak,partial}_ordering and deprecate
> QPartialOrdering in favor of the new types.
> 
> We need to provide conversion between QPartialOrdering and
> Qt::partial_ordering, but the new types can be fully BC with std.

I don't think this minor thing is worth the hassle. It uglifies our API for 
little gain.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20231113/c19b56bd/attachment.bin>