[Development] Error database cleaning continues

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Tue Sep 29 19:55:22 CEST 2026


Il 29/09/26 18:53, Ilya Fedin ha scritto:
> Even if one spends the effort to improve it, the attempt gets ignored
> unless it's some critical issue. If the attempt was a bug report, it
> gets a priority and everyone forgets about it. If it was a patch in
> gerrit, no one will review it in months and years even though you added
> the module maaintainer from the change creation.

Two wrongs don't make a right.

What you're describing is true, and it's a problem with its own source, 
and possibly its own solutions.

How does closing bugs because they're old/inactive change anything 
regarding what you've just said?

Thanks,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4889 bytes
Desc: Firma crittografica S/MIME
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20260929/8ebe4672/attachment.bin>


More information about the Development mailing list