[Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
adam.weinrich at nokia.com
adam.weinrich at nokia.com
Mon Apr 23 20:57:42 CEST 2012
Was a mac ‘desktop’ license used or was a Qt embedded license used to create the commercial plugin? I assume desktop developer licenses. I wonder if this is 100% consistent with Digias desktop license or if an exception was/needs to be negotiated.
Will commercial users of Ians iOS port require commercial Qt licenses to deploy their mac apps? (Is think static linking may be required to get AppStore compliance-has that been figured out?)
From: ext Jason H [mailto:scorp1us at yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:41 PM
To: Jason H; Weinrich Adam (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley); Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch; interest at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
Also the commercial plugin was made using a commercial Qt license.
________________________________
From: Jason H <scorp1us at yahoo.com<mailto:scorp1us at yahoo.com>>
To: "adam.weinrich at nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinrich at nokia.com>" <adam.weinrich at nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinrich at nokia.com>>; "Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch<mailto:Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch>" <Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch<mailto:Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch>>; "interest at qt-project.org<mailto:interest at qt-project.org>" <interest at qt-project.org<mailto:interest at qt-project.org>>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
Ian has two version the free UIKit, and the commercial version. There are many differences, in that the commercial uses a couple extra classes he developed to use the iOS libraries where required by the AppStore (WebKit, multimedia, etc). Also supporting multitouch and such.
________________________________
From: "adam.weinrich at nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinrich at nokia.com>" <adam.weinrich at nokia.com<mailto:adam.weinrich at nokia.com>>
To: scorp1us at yahoo.com<mailto:scorp1us at yahoo.com>; Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch<mailto:Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch>; interest at qt-project.org<mailto:interest at qt-project.org>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 12:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
“Embedded” is an broad term and a moving target that always seems to require clarification. AFAIU Digia wont engage in mobile consumer embedded platform licensing. Android and iOS could be called ‘leading embedded platforms’ but are a special mass consumer case and dont generate commercial license revenue.
Digia already has public deals with RIM QNX, WindRiver VxWorks and Greenhills Integrity for supporting and selling Qt license to custom device makers on these embedded platforms. Its great that Qt will penetrate these platform markets too. It may be helpful to remember that Qt “Embedded devices” have always had runtime distribution fees per device as well as developer licenses..
Im not expecting Digia to be involved in writing or even licensing any ‘official’ or unofficial mobile platform ports.
I am curious about Ian’s IOS plugin commercial licensing corner case though if anyone can clarify that it could help the discussion.
-Adam
From: interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia.com at qt-project.org<mailto:interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia.com at qt-project.org> [mailto:interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia.com at qt-project.org]<mailto:[mailto:interest-bounces+adam.weinrich=nokia.com at qt-project.org]> On Behalf Of ext Jason H
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:59 AM
To: Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch<mailto:Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch>; interest at qt-project.org<mailto:interest at qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
They aren't embedded.
Digia means QNX, MQX (please!), embedded linux, VxWorks, on PPC, ARM, MIPS, SH, and the like.
________________________________
From: "Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch<mailto:Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch>" <Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch<mailto:Lucas.Betschart at crypto.ch>>
To: interest at qt-project.org<mailto:interest at qt-project.org>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:45 AM
Subject: [Interest] Qt for Android & iOS
Quoted from digia.com<http://digia.com> (digia.com/en/Qt/Digia-is-Committed-to-Qt/<http://digia.com/en/Qt/Digia-is-Committed-to-Qt/>):
"
Digia is comitted to:
...
- Advancing the cross-platform Qt promise by supporting leading ( !! ) desktop and embedded platforms
...
"
So we doubtless can expect an official Android and iOS port since they're leading embedded platforms?
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org<mailto:Interest at qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org<mailto:Interest at qt-project.org>
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20120423/e09ab7a4/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list