[Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
bm_witness at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 14 16:04:18 CEST 2012
> From: Atlant Schmidt <aschmidt at dekaresearch.com>
> To: 'Bob Hood' <bhood2 at comcast.net>; "interest at qt-project.org" <interest at qt-project.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 9:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Digia to acquire Qt from Nokia
>> Wait a sec... wasn't that because Nokia bought a highly valuable
>> toolkit, got a lot of testing and probably even bug fixes "for
>> free" from the community, had a gazillion of Qt developers just
>> waiting to unleash their creativity on Nokia phones... and then
>> decided NOT to use it by going Windows mobile exclusively? Wasn't
>> THAT the reason they failed with Qt?
> That's not exactly how it played out. By the time of Symbian^3,
> Qt was a standard feature of Nokia's Symbian phones. Anna and
> Belle also contained it as standard.
> And if I'm not mistaken, by that time, hadn't Nokia switched
> over to using a Qt-based Web browser on Symbian? How many of
> the software's other standard apps had been switched to Qt-
> based designs? (The plan certainly was to switch all of them,
> but I left Nokia before the changeover was accomplished.)
> Nokia didn't exactly throw away Qt without ever deploying it.
He didn't say they didn't deploy (though I could see how that was implied);
just that they committed to it as a strategy that was 100% compatible with what
they were doing before, only to then go quickly in a very different direction that
was 100% compatible with any previous direction.
Qt didn't fail at Nokia.
Nokia failed to utilize Qt and stick with a strategy long enough to see it through to sucess.
Nokia's failure in that regard is their own, and purely a business one that has
no link to how Qt is licensed (other than possible political ones for Elop, but that's neither
here nor there).
More information about the Interest