[Interest] Providing custom lib with static Qt modules (so no Qt dependency)

[Bob Hood]

On 2/28/2012 10:53 AM, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> Den 28-02-2012 18:16, Atlant Schmidt skrev:
>>    All this may not apply to you if you're distributing
>>    Qt under the Commercial license.
>
> AFAIR, you're not allowed to redistribute the commercial licensed Qt. 

Um, what?  I thought that was at least part of the reason why one would
purchase a commercial license in the first place, so you can redistribute your
use of Qt in any form you like (shared or static).  The other part would be
support.  Am I just misunderstanding what you're trying to say?


Render me gone,                       |||
Bob                                 ^(===)^
---------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------------------
    I'm not so good with advice...can I interest you in a sarcastic comment?