[Interest] Where are the USER properties of Qt-provided QObjects documented?

[Stephen Kelly]

On Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:09:16 K. Frank wrote:
> If we take the attitude that the lack of documentation of which
> property is the USER property means that this is not part of the
> official public interface of the class and is a mere implementation
> detail that can be changed willy-nilly in the future, then a new
> version of Qt would be allowed to break my (beautiful) code.

This was changed in Qt 4.8

https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,31035

> 
> The USER property feels like part of a QObject's public interface
> and therefore ought to be documented (and stable).

I agree. Like all changes, the impact on users of Qt needs to be evaluated.

Thanks,

-- 
Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20120726/d0a40312/attachment.sig>