[Interest] [OT] Re: Is Nokia officially done with Qt?

Jason H scorp1us at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 19 20:32:27 CEST 2012


Does this have solely to do with the QtQuick 2.0 stuff? That the older platforms are ill-equipped to run 2.0? If so, that makes perfect sense. 




________________________________
 From: Xizhi Zhu <xizhi.zhu at gmail.com>
To: qtnext <qtnext at gmail.com> 
Cc: interest at qt-project.org 
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Interest] [OT] Re: Is Nokia officially done with Qt?
 

Qt 5 won't support Symbian and Maemo at all, which was already decided months ago.


On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:50 PM, qtnext <qtnext at gmail.com> wrote:


>on git today : http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtquick1/commits/master
>
>Strip out Maemo5 code.
>Remove Symbian support.
>Le 19/06/2012 17:40, Jason H a écrit :
>
>Well Nokia just introduced the 808 to the US. Symbian Belle based, programmed in Qt, same icons as my N9.
>>Maybe the Linux stuff goes away, but Qt stays on for app-development on Symbian?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Michael Seydl <michael.seydl at gmail.com>
>>To: Qt Interest <interest at qt-project.org> 
>>Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 1:01 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Interest] [OT] Re: Is Nokia officially done with Qt?
>> 
>>
>>Yeah let's see how everything works out. I hope for the best. 
>>
>>
>>Austria, Vienna, 32C, cloudless.
>>
>>
>>Greets,
>>Mike
>>
>>On 17.06.2012, at 18:30, "Slade, Zac" <zachary.slade at hp.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>It is nice and cloudless here in Fayetteville, Arkansas USA.  I think i will get a sunday and dream of more Qt ideas.
>>>
>>>Keep up the great work on Qt (even you d3fault).
>>>
>>>Sorry for the empty post...  this phone has a mind of its own sometimes.
>>>-Zac
>>>
>>>Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original message-----
>>>From: Till Oliver Knoll <till.oliver.knoll at gmail.com>
>>>To: Qt Interest <interest at qt-project.org>
>>>Sent: Sun, Jun 17, 2012 02:24:31 CDT
>>>Subject: [Interest] [OT] Re: Is Nokia officially done with Qt?
>>>
>>>Am 17.06.2012 um 00:00 schrieb Harri Pasanen <harri at mpaja.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>...   Let's
>>>>
>>>see how the land lies after the dust settles.
>>>>
>>>So we conclude that "the Qt forum is now officially done with this topic" - and goes back to work (or the Art Basel for a change :))
>>>
>>>Have a sunny Sunday (there /must/ be a cloudless sky somewhere)! :)
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>> Oliver
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Interest mailing list
>>>Interest at qt-project.org
>>>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Interest mailing list
>>>Interest at qt-project.org
>>>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Interest mailing list
>>Interest at qt-project.org
>>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list Interest at qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Interest mailing list
>Interest at qt-project.org
>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
>


-- 
Blessings,
Xizhi Zhu (Steven)


_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20120619/3dbd1df4/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list