[Interest] Qt is good because...
harri at mpaja.com
Tue Mar 27 13:38:15 CEST 2012
On 03/27/2012 12:02 PM, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Quim Gil<quim.gil at nokia.com> wrote:
>>> - C++
>> Please help explaining this further (as I'm not a C++ developer myself).
>> otherwise we risk keeping the perception that Qt is C++ only and scaring
>> would fit perfectly in the context of Qt Quick& Qt WebKit.
> Right, in my POV, C++ "feature" of Qt should be a bit less emphasized
> away. As it might feel too tall a hill to climb for new developers,
> and is the reason why projects like PhoneGap and related gain more and
> more popularity and decision makers move more and more towards the
> On the other hand, Qt is interesting as of its use of C++ employing
> advanced C++ concepts and allows for unprecedented power when you go
> the low level C++ path...
Nowadays I work mostly in mobile space, but not exclusively.
Personally for me C & C++ support are essential, as those provide access
to a wealth of ready to use libraries, like libav, opencv, etc.
They also provide the required speed improvement when starting to polish
feature complete applications. I may do the prototype/first version in
Good Python support in Qt is nice, although for mobile less interesting
C++ popularity together.
Python was the clear winner.
I find Qt Creator very good, I like it best from qtcreator, eclipse,
xcode, all of which I've been using.
Qt documentation is also top notch, better than Android, and easier to
access and search than Apple docs.
My 2 cents,
More information about the Interest