alexmalvtk at gmail.com
Wed Dec 18 00:23:02 CET 2013
I do not care about binaries, which I used to build myself anyway. They are
But I do not want to lose 2010 support.
When your code is dependent on different languages and 3rd party products
you tend to stay on the old compilers for long time.
Often you have to skip versions cause 3rd party introduced bug which often
is fixed only 2 ore more versions after it was found ( my regards to INTEL
Fortran compiler which allowed me to skip VS 2008 transition completely).
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Thiago Macieira
<thiago.macieira at intel.com>wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2013 21:17:56, Felix morack wrote:
> > I think a lot of us windows guys want to move over to VS2013
> > bugs in VS2012 and all).
> > Unfortunately, VS2013 wasnt released in time to have full support in Qt
> > VS2013 has been around for a while now, and code to update the VSAddon to
> > support VS2013 has been reviewed, approved and merged into the respective
> > master branch over a week ago, and is ready to ship.
> > A lot of people, including myself, have been using 5.2RC with VS2013
> > successfully for some time now.
> > Given all that, can we hope for a quick transition to 5.2.1, with VS2013
> > support in the online installer and a release of the VSAddon?
> We need to drop something else.
> Would people feel bad if we no longer provided binaries for VS 2010?
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Interest