[Interest] Bringing Qt, C++ To The Web

[Attila Csipa]

On 18/01/13 13:41, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> No, NaCL provides sand-boxing as well and is thus a very safe
> alternative to downloading a native executable. Downloading and
> installing a browser plugin tends to be a much more stream-lined process
> too.
>
> I guess someone just needs to write a killer application in Qt that is
> deployed via a web page and NaCL, and people will switch to Chrome in
> order to run it (until other browsers get NaCL support). Since Qt makes
> it much easier to write a killer application that shouldn't be too hard? :p

There are already fairly popular cases of such (even dual plugin/NaCL) 
setups, for example Unity ( 
http://docs.unity3d.com/Documentation/Manual/nacl-gettingstarted.html ) 
which do seem a lot more appealing than going JS with something the 
caliber of Qt. PNaCL might make the native approach maybe even more 
appealing in the future.

Best regards,
Attila
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20130118/4ac32036/attachment.html>