[Interest] Advantage of Qt5 over Qt4 for C++/Widgets

[Jason H]

Lua is an impressive little language with a ton of library support. It's not fast though. LuaJIT is better, if you have a choice. 

However my favorite is Python. It's also easy to integrate (see PySide, PyQt, SIP). 

If you want performance though, Perl is extremely fast. I haven't integrated it into Qt as I have with Python, but I did know a guy who put it into a .Net program to do pipelined string processing of 1,000-10,0000 ASCII messages a second, and it didn't ever underperform. We selected Perl because it was  the fastest of what we tested.





________________________________
 From: Konstantin Tokarev <annulen at yandex.ru>
To: Syam Krishnan <syamcr at gmail.com>; Qt Interest <interest at qt-project.org> 
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Advantage of Qt5 over Qt4 for C++/Widgets
 



13.09.2013, 18:45, "Syam Krishnan" <syamcr at gmail.com>:
> 4. Would like to have our C++ applications support scripting by using
> Javascript (and be good at it - V8?)

Try to use Lua (e.g. LuaJIT) - you'll get even better speed with much
less library size. Also, you can choose one of lots C++ bindings available
which better suites your needs.

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20130913/f0419f2c/attachment.html>