[Interest] Licensing Questions

[alfa]

Hi Sarah,

If I understand it correctly regarding the licensing issue, you may want to use LGPL(as opposed to GPL), that does not require you to release the source code, however, perhaps somebody who are more experienced than me can explain on this, because I'm also interested in knowing this issue and any possible solutions.

-alfa-
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 12:47 PM, sarah jones <qtsarah at outlook.com> wrote:
 
 
Hi
I team and I are planning to release our desktop application that is dynamically linked to the Qt library.
As I understand it this means that, if requested by a customer, I must make the source code for Qt available.
In addition I must make the  object code or source code for the application available to a customer on request.

Has anyone any experience in this area ?
Are my understandings correct?
Are there any obligations on us if using the LPGL?

Thanks

Sarah

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20140402/907531f4/attachment.html>