[Interest] QNAM timeout is way too long

[Thiago Macieira]

Em seg 21 abr 2014, às 21:30:23, Scott Aron Bloom escreveu:
> I had filed a bug, against QHttp and QFtp almost 6 or 7 years ago, right as
> QNAM came out, of course it was closed because "those classes were being
> deprecated for QNAM", to add a "setTimeout" to the request calls...
> 
> I would love to have this on QNetworkRequest...

QHttp and QFtp were sequential. You needed to have the class time out on a 
command before the next was executed. You couldn't do the timeout from outside 
the class. (and they can't do from the inside either, but that's a different 
story)

QNAM runs stuff in parallel. If you need to time out a QNetworkReply, abort() 
it. That means you can do from the outside with a simple QTimer.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center