[Interest] New connection syntax
igor.mironchik at gmail.com
Tue Dec 16 19:28:01 CET 2014
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:04:03 +0300, Thiago Macieira
<thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2014 20:31:14 Igor Mironchik wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:13:14 +0300, Thiago Macieira
>> <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 16 December 2014 12:41:35 Igor Mironchik wrote:
>> >> And my question is: is it ok to use QtPrivate::FunctionPointer in my
>> >> classes?
>> > No. That's only permitted for code that is part of Qt itself (hosted
>> > qt-
>> > project.org, part of qt.git)
>> Am I understand you correct that there is license restriction on using
>> Or it's not permitted because it's in "private" namespace only?
> Neither. It's just unwise to do it because we may change subtly or
> totally, or
> even remove the class in the future. You should not rely on it existing
> behaving like it does today. It's the same as what applies to the private
> headers that are installed and you can #include if you want.
> If you want to do it, there's nothing stopping you.
> But we might just change the class to spite you.
Thank you guys for the explanations... :)
More information about the Interest