[Interest] Confusion regarding Qt 5 build on Windows

Mandeep Sandhu mandeepsandhu.chd at gmail.com
Mon Feb 10 10:25:08 CET 2014


Thx Guys!

For now, I've disabled widgets too.

-mandeep


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Koehne Kai <Kai.Koehne at digia.com> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: interest-bounces+kai.koehne=digia.com at qt-project.org
> > [mailto:interest-bounces+kai.koehne=digia.com at qt-project.org] On Behalf
> > Of Mandeep Sandhu
> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 9:57 AM
> > To: Interest at qt-project.org
> > Subject: Re: [Interest] Confusion regarding Qt 5 build on Windows
> >
> >
> >
> >       Isn't GUI as super-set of the Widgets module?
>
> No, widgets is a module that depends on gui.
>
> > As in, if I don't want
> > GUI, I don't want Widgets too, right? I was expecting both to be
> disabled.
> > What am I missing here?
>
> Nothing, just that the Windows configure is apparently missing a sanity
> check here, i.e.
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,77762
>
> > Apparently, I was missing something....the "-no-widgets" option. I think
> I
> > forgot that in the new modularized structure of Qt, widgets is a separate
> > module.
> >
> >
> > But still, shouldn't the QWidgets headers be generated? Or is "-no-gui"
> with
> > widgets enabled not a valid option?
>
> It's not a valid option. I guess that is sanity checked in the qmake logic
> somewhere, otherwise the build should've failed much before the autotests :)
>
> Regards
>
> Kai
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20140210/e6306204/attachment.html>


More information about the Interest mailing list