[Interest] STILL LOOKING for a QPA

Tue May 20 18:30:23 CEST 2014

Em ter 20 maio 2014, às 16:01:29, Jason Hihn escreveu:
> <html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size:
> 12.0px;"><div>I can appreciate that the API is unstable, and jsut putting
> that in the documentation as /* THAR BE DRAGONS HERE */ (which I've
> seen in actual code somewhere, not necessarily Qt) or something to that
> affect would be sufficient.</div>

We're not going to put private API documentation in the public docs. There's a 
way to enable private documentation in Qt, but you need to rebuild the docs.

As for QPA, there is no documentation written in a form that can generate HTML 
(because the \class docs are missing). The source code is the documentation. 
If you're creating a QPA plugin, you have the source code readily available.

> <div>Though I would ask how unstable is it 18 months in?</div>

It's stable.

PS: please don't send HTML email.
-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center